Employment Report and GDP

By Thomas Cooley and Peter Rupert

The BEA’s 2nd estimate of Q1 GDP shaved off 0.1 percentage points to a now revised growth rate of 2.2% at a seasonally adjusted annualized rate.  Personal consumption expenditures were quite weak, revised down from 1.1% to 1.0% , the lowest reading since 2013 Q2. The change also resulted from downward revisions to private inventory investment, residential fixed investment (revised from 0.0% to -2.0%), and exports, but partly offset by an upward revision to non-residential fixed investment (from 6.1% to 9.2%).

nrfireal-q-2018-06-01

residentialinv-2018-06-01

May Employment Report

Today’s employment report from the BLS revealed continued strength in the labor market with an increase of 223,000 jobs, of which 218,000  were in the private sector. The only significant declines were found in motor vehicles and parts, down 4,400 and temporary help services, down 7,800.

empchgm-2018-06-01

Average weekly hours remained at 34.5 for the fourth month in a row. Average hourly pay increased from $26.84 to $26.92.

avghours-2018-06-01

ahecpi-2018-06-01

The household survey also showed continued strength with the number of unemployed persons falling by 281,000 leading to a further decline in the unemployment rate from 3.93% to 3.75%…the lowest since 1969!

unrate-2018-06-01

The week ended on a high note with both the GDP and employment reports showing continued strength. Have a nice weekend!

Snapshot – Fourth Quarter GDP Estimates – Growth Improves, Concerns Remain

Welcome to the Cooley-Rupert Economic Snapshot, our view of the current economic environment. This is the latest version of our snapshot of the U.S. Economy based on the preliminary fourth quarter data on National Income and Product from the Bureau of Economic Analysis and the Federal Reserve. As in previous snapshots we present the data in a way that we find particularly useful for assessing where we are in the business cycle and tracking the U.S. economic recovery. The paths of all the series presented are plotted relative to the their value at the peak of the respective business cycles. We use the business cycle dates identified by the National Bureau of Economic Research.

We present the data in four sections. The first summarizes the path of Gross Domestic Product and its components. This post primarily updates GDP and its components based on preliminary estimates of fourth quarter activity from the BEA. We also include the most recent labor market data and the summary of activity in credit markets. The final section summarizes the features of industrial production and inflation.

As always we welcome any suggestions for additional data that you would like to see and suggestions for how to improve the presentation of the data. Click here to go to the latest snapshot in one pdf document. Or, read on–

How bad is this recession and how should we assess the recovery?

The preliminary estimates of fourth quarter GDP and its components show that the economy picked up a little momentum with GDP increasing at an annual rate of 2.8% compared to the rather anemic 1.8% growth rate in the third quarter. We should caution that preliminary estimates have been revised downward in both of the previous two quarters, so the 2.8 percent figure could be optimistic. The figure below shows that the recovery has now brought GDP above the previous peak.

Several things become apparent when looking at the above picture. First, the length of the downturn of the current cycle was close to what it has been in previous cycles. However the depth was much more severe bringing real GDP more than 5% below its peak level.  Second, and more discouraging, the length of the recovery has been much longer and the pace much slower.  It has taken 16 quarters for real GDP to reach its previous peak level.  In all other post-war cycles, the longest GDP has taken to reach previous peak was 8 quarters during the 1973 cycle. It is obvious why this last episode has been called the “The Great Recession,”  but we may want to add to that “The Abysmal Recovery.”

While it is useful to know the beginning and ending dates of a cycle, there is no standard by which to characterize the severity (for lack of a better word), i.e., the length and depth. In other words, we lack a metric to compare the various cycles.

As an example, absent the financial crisis and the recession, the U.S. economy would have continued to grow. Figuring out the rate at which it would have grown is somewhat of an issue but if we assume the economy would have continued to grow at average post 1950 rate for the U.S. economy then real GDP for the fourth quarter of 2011 would have been $15.018 trillion compared to $13.422 trillion in constant (2005) dollars. When one is assessing the severity of this recession it is not enough to measure the gap relative to a previous peak.

Below we present a graph of potential growth paths from the peaks of each cycle since 1950. As in the example above, we present an estimate of the cost at each quarter as the sum of the percentage losses in GDP relative to its long term growth path from the previous peak. This is seen in the following table. This measurement is certainly an upper bound on the cost.


Continue reading “Snapshot – Fourth Quarter GDP Estimates – Growth Improves, Concerns Remain”