Q4 GDP and PCE

by paul gomme and peter rupert

The BEA announced that real GDP increased 1.4% in Q4 and 4.4% in Q3. Consumption grew at 2.4%, the largest contributor to overall GDP growth.

Real investment increased 3.8%. Non-residential structures investment declined for the eighth straight quarter and residential investment has declined in six of the last eight quarters. The biggest drag on GDP came from the government sector, falling 5.1% and contributed -0.9 percentage points to overall GDP.

Prices

No good news for prices. The BEA announced that the personal consumption expenditures price index (PCE) increased 4.35% in December on an annualized basis. Our preferred trend measure increased 3.23%. Excluding food and energy, prices also rose 4.35% and our trend measure came in at 3.11%. Of particular note: all of the PCE-based inflation measures that we report on a regular basis are up and well above the Fed’s 2% target.

Keep in mind that the Federal government shutdown in October 2025 has delayed the release of PCE data. Prior to the shutdown, the December data would have been released at the end of January, not late February. We’ve been using a naive forecast of PCE inflation using CPI inflation data. This forecast did not do too well for December. Trend PCE inflation for December was forecast to be 2.47% (down 20 basis points from November); in fact, this measure of inflation was 3.23% (up 56 basis points). Similarly, trend core PCE inflation was forecast at 2.11% (down 39 basis points) whereas it actually rose to 3.11% (up 61 basis points). With all of this in mind, the forecast for January is: trend PCE inflation, 2.29%; trend core PCE inflation, 2.46%.

Policy outlook

Given the rise in the inflation numbers and a moderate change in GDP, it certainly seems like there isn’t much of a chance for an interest rate cut any time soon. The labor market (see below) doesn’t change that view since the report last month did not have any major surprises.

January employment report and CPI Inflation

by paul gomme and peter rupert

The BLS announced that employment rose by 130,000 in January. Of particular interest, the private sector added 172,000 jobs as the government shed 42,000.

The goods producing sector saw an increase of 36,000 jobs, mostly in the construction sector, up 33,000. Something we haven’t seen in a while…manufacturing employment increased 5,000, the first increase in, well, a lot of months. The information sector, however, continues to shrink, losing another 12,000 jobs.

As noted in its press release, the BLS annual benchmarks the establishment data against more comprehensive measures of payroll employment. This benchmarking exercise lowered nonfarm employment for March 2025 by 860,000 for the raw data, and by 898,000 for seasonally adjusted data. These downward revisions dwarf the 181,000 jobs gained for all of 2025.

The household survey, that collects information on the civilian labor force status, showed that the labor force (the sum of employed and unemployed) increased 387,000 while the number of unemployed fell 141,000, leading to a slight decline in the unemployment rate from 4.38% to 4.28%.

Overall CPI inflation fell in January. The annualized monthly inflation rate fell from 3.63% in December to 2.07% in January. Annual (year-over-year) inflation fell more modestly, from 2.73% (December) to 2.51% (January). Our measure of trend inflation fell from 2.65% (December) to 2.39% (January).

Monthly core CPI inflation rose sharply from 2.83% to 3.60% while annual inflation fell moderately from 2.65% to 2.51%. As we have previously discussed, both of these measures have important drawbacks: high volatility in the case of monthly inflation, sluggishness for annual inflation. Our trend measure, designed to address these shortcomings, rose from 2.26% to 2.71%.

Regular readers know that the FOMC focuses on (core) PCE inflation, not CPI inflation. However, CPI data is typically released two weeks earlier than the PCE data, and given the overlap in coverage, CPI inflation provides a useful, more timely information on the likely PCE inflation rate. The information lag has been exacerbated by the Federal government shutdown last fall: data for December is scheduled to be released late next week. To predict the soon-to-be-released PCE inflation rate, we regressed a measure of PCE inflation (for example, trend core PCE inflation) against its corresponding, contemporaneous CPI inflation rate. For months when PCE data has not been released, we use this regression to forecast PCE inflation.

Overall monthly PCE inflation for December is forecast to be 3.20%, higher than the observed value of 2.52% in November; this measure of inflation is then expected to fall to 2.08%. The annual PCE inflation rate is projected to fall from 2.77% in November to 2.63 in December and further fall to 2.14% in January. Our trend measure is seen to fall from 2.55% (November) to 2.47% (December) and subsequently to 2.28%.

Monthly core PCE inflation is expected to rise from 1.94% (November) to 2.69% (December) and then to 3.16% (January). The picture for annual core PCE inflation is better: November’s 2.79% rate is forecast to fall to 2.37% in December and further fall to 2.26% in January. Our trend measure of core PCE inflation is projected to fall from 2.39% in November to 2.11% in December before rising again to 2.45%.

Markets and most commentators expect that the FOMC will leave the fed funds rate unchanged at its next meeting. This week’s data helps explain why. The labor market is holding up quite well with reasonably strong job creation (particularly in the private sector) and the unemployment rate is fairly low. Meanwhile, inflation is stuck above the FOMC’s 2% target.

GDP and PCE

by paul gomme and peter rupert

This morning, the BEA released updated third quarter GDP and Personal Income and Outlays. Real GDP growth was revised up from 4.3% to 4.4% for the third quarter of 2025. The largest contributor to the GDP growth came from consumer spending, rising 3.5%, that contributed 2.34 percentage points to the overall growth. Investment showed no change, however, both non-residential and residential structures declined sharply, 5.0% and 7.1%, respectively, while equipment and intellectual property products increased 5.2% and 5.6%, respectively.

The BEA is clearly working hard to get back onto schedule, releasing Personal Income data for October and November 2025. This release is the source for PCE (personal consumption expenditure) price data. Starting with the overall PCE inflation, the annualized month-over-month inflation rate for November was 2.52%, up from 1.93% in October, but down from3.18% in September. The annual, or 12 month-over-12 month, inflation rate was 2.77% in November, little changed from September (2.74%) but up slightly from October (2.68%). Our measure of trend inflation was 2.55% in November, almost the same as in October (2.56%) and down from September (2.88%).

Turning to core PCE inflation (that is, excluding food and energy), the annualized monthly inflation rate was 1.94% in November, down from 2.30% in September and 2.52% in October. There was not much change in the annual inflatino rate: it was 2.79% in November compared to 2.83% in September and 2.75 in October. Our trend measure for November was down to 2.39% compared to 2.67% in September and 2.62% in October).

December PCE data is scheduled for release on February 20. The release schedule is scheduled to catch up to its previous pace (just under a one month lag) only by April 30. These continued lags are most unfortunate since the FOMC’s preferred measure of inflation is based on core PCE. In a previous post on CPI inflation, we discussed running a regression of PCE inflation against the contemporaneous measure of CPI inflation, then using the more timely CPI inflation to predict PCE inflation. Overall PCE inflation is predicted to rise on a month-over-month basis (from 2.52 in November to 3.29% in December), fall on an annual basis (2.36 in December compared to 2.72% in November), and our measure of trend is predicted to fall from 2.58% to 2.44%. Predictions for core PCE inflation show similar patterns: the monthly rate rising from 1.94% to 2.75%; the annual falling from 2.79% to 2.37%; and our trend measure falling to 2.11% from 2.39%.

A strong case can be made for keeping the Fed funds rate unchanged. Output growth is very strong and inflation is still above the FOMC’s 2% target. While job creation has weakened, the unemployment rate is quite low by historic standards.

Consumer and Producer Prices

The BLS’s Consumer Price Index release is mildly bad news on the inflation front. While the overall CPI inflation rate fell, on an annual basis, from 2.61% in November to 2.65% in December, the monthly rate picked up from 1.23% to 3.75% (on an annualized basis). Our measure of trend rose from 2.19% to 2.71%.

Annual core CPI inflation (that is, excluding the `volatile’ food and energy components) showed little change, rising from 2.62% in November to 2.65% in December). However, the montly rate rose sharply from 0.96% to 2.91%. The increase in our trend measure was more moderate, rising from 1.94% to 2.26%.

The BLS also released Producer Prices for November 2025, so a bit dated. That portion of the producer price index relevant to personal consumption shows inflation running above the FOMC’s 2% target.

Much of our interest in the CPI data arises from its role as a signal for the PCE (personal consumption expenditure) index data that will be released in just over a week. Past experience tells us that while CPI and PCE inflation tend to move together, this is not a tight relationship in that one percentage point increase in CPI inflation is no guarantee that PCE inflation will similarly rise by one percentage point. With this in mind, we regressed measures of PCE inflation against their CPI counterparts, then used these regressions to develop predictions for PCE inflation later this month. This statistical model predicts that year-over-year PCE inflation for December will be around 2.36% (for both overall PCE and core PCE inflation) while our measure of trend will be 2.44% for overall PCE, and 2.11% for core PCE inflation. We will see how well these predictions fare.

Given these numbers it seems unlikely that the Fed will be lowering rates any time soon, i.e., inflation is, by no means, tamed.

Labor market stuff

by paul gomme and peter rupert

Employment

The BLS announced that December employment increased by 50,000, following November’s 56,000 (revised down from 64,000). October employment fell 173,000 after a 68,000 downward revision.

Despite the weak employment gains from the Establishment Survey, the unemployment rate ticked down from 4.54% in November to 4.38% in December. This fall in the unemployment rate is chiefly due to the number of unemployed persons falling from 7.8 million (November) to 7.5 million (December). This decline was large enough that the labor force fell (by 46 thousand). On its own, a drop in the labor force tends to push up the unemployment rate.

job openings and labor turnover survey (JOLTS)

According to the JOLTS data, there was very little movement in vacancies, hires or layoffs. The rates shown below are calculated by the variable in question divided by total employment or total employment plus openings. For example, if employment is 9.5 million and there are 0.5 million openings then the openings rate is 0.5/(9.5+0.5) = .05 = 5%. It is also useful to see the relationship between the level of unemployment and the level of openings. The number of unemployed persons fell by 278,000 in December, leaving 7.5 million unemployed persons, close to the number of job openings, 7.1 million.

Productivity and costs

Nonfarm business sector labor productivity increased 4.9% in the third quarter of 2025. Output increased 5.4% while hours worked increased only slightly, 0.5%. This led to a decline in unit labor costs of 1.9% as hourly compensation increased by 2.9% while productivity increased 4.9%.

Discussion

Despite the somewhat anemic employment numbers, other aspects of the labor market are doing well. Unemployment has fallen a bit, productivity is the highest we have seen in a couple of years. Firms continue to have vacant slots and, as can be seen in the JOLTS graphs above, tend to fall quite quickly at the onset of a recession. No sign of that yet. So, if you are searching for a reason to lower rates, this probably isn’t the best place to look.

Q3 GDP Reveals strong growth

By Paul gomme and peter rupert

The BEA announced that real GDP for the 3rd quarter showed strong growth, rising 4.3% on a seasonally adjusted annualized basis. This is the highest growth since Q3 of 2023. Consumption growth led the charge, increasing 3.5%.

While consumption has been strong, investment has not. Outside of the large swings, likely due to tariff announcements, investment has been dismal over the past year, declining three times in the past five quarters.

Policy Implications

Members of the FOMC wishing to hold interest rates fixed (or even raise them) will, no doubt, point to the high real output and consumption growth. Those advocating lower rates will emphasize the fall in investment as well as the weak jobs growth between September and November and the increase in the unemployment rate. Much rides on the core PCE inflation rate. Data for November was supposed to be released on December 19, but has been delayed; the next (scheduled) release is for December 2025 (not November) on January 29, 2026. That will not leave much time to digest the incoming inflation data since the next FOMC meeting is January 30-31. We will see where the FOMC comes down on the potential “risks” to the economy in terms of inflation and the real side of the economy.

Inflation and jobs

We are finally seeing jobs numbers for October and November. The Bureau of Labor Statistics press release studiously failed to mention the loss of 105 thousand jobs in October — except to mention the 162 thousand fall in federal government employment. Perhaps this omission is a leftover from Trump having fired the previous head of the BLS after the BLS revised the May and June employment numbers down. With September employment revised down to 108 thousand (from 119 thousand), there was a scant 3,000 increase in employment over September and October. November delivered an anemic 64 thousand job gain.

As noted in the BLS press release, due to the Federal government shut down, the household survey for October was not collected. In the figures using household survey data, we have allocated half of the change from September to November to each of October and November (and omit the October figure to emphasize that this data is unavailable).

The unemployment rate is similarly missing for October 2025. The November unemployment rate rose to 4.56%, up from 4.44% in September. This is the highest unemployment rate in four years.

Overall, the employment numbers are fairly weak. Although average weekly hours rose from 34.2 to 34.3, so that total hours of work in the US rose. Moreover, firms continue to be opening jobs at a relatively high rate even though the hiring rate has been falling.

Inflation

There were two price index reports released, the September PCE and the November CPI. The September monthly (annualized) PCE rose slightly, from 3.14% to 3.27%. Our preferred trend measure rose from 2.70% to 2.89%. The Fed’s inflation measure of choice, the core PCE (PCEX) fell from 2.68% to 2.40% and our trend measure also fell, from 2.82% to 2.68%. While core PCE inflation is moving in the right direction, it is still above the FOMC’s 2% target.

Due to the federal government shutdown, October data for the Consumer Price Index was not collected. Below, the November CPI inflation rate is the average for the two months from September to November. The monthly annualized CPI rate for October November averaged 1.23%, down from 3.79% in September and our trend measure fell to 2.19% (October-November) from 3.38% in September. In the graphs below we have included the November number with dots. Annualized core CPI inflation was 0.92% in October-November while the trend measure was 1.94%.

Certainly good news on the inflation front: the last reading on the Fed’s preferred core PCE inflation measure moved down (albeit still above target) and the more timely CPI measures have continued downward, a trend that hopefully will soon be reflected in the PCE inflation measures. As inflation approaches target, the inflation hawks on the FOMC will have less reason to insist on keeping interest rates high. At the same time, the slow hiring in the labor market should allow some to argue more strongly for more rate cuts.

A little Late: September Inlation

By Paul Gomme and Peter Rupert

The BEA, back up and running, announced that PCE inflation was 3.27% (on an annualized basis) in September, up from 3.14% in August. The year over year number also increased, from 2.74% in August to 2.79% in September. Our preferred trend measure also moved up, from 2.70% in August to 2.89% in September.

Excluding food and energy, PCEX, actually fell slightly, from 2.68% to 2.40%. The year over year number also fell, from 2.90% to 2.83%. Our calculated trend measure fell from 2.82% to 2.68%.

A Longer Perspective

Recall that in the pandemic period, the Fed fucked up badly on the inflation front. PCE/PCEX inflation started falling starting in mid-2022. Breaking the PCE price index into its components, goods and services, our chart shows that the bulk of the progress on the PCE/PCEX inflation front came from its goods component which declined rapidly in late 2022, and has exhibited deflation (negative inflation) for some time (so much for the Keynesian adage that prices are downward sticky). In contrast, PCE services inflation was slow to come down and has run persistently above the Fed’s 2% target for PCEX inflation.

This breakdown between goods and services has gained traction among those trying to parse out, in real time, the effects of the Trump tariffs on prices and inflation. The idea is that the effects of these tariffs will be seen first in goods prices. Through 2025, our charts show a gradual rise in PCE goods inflation; the large increase in the monthly goods inflation rate in September has pushed our measure of trend above the Fed’s 2% target. This behavior of PCE goods inflation is consistent with the tariffs story. That PCE/PCEX inflation has been flat (or mildly rising) in 2025 is now due to the moderating effect of somewhat lower PCE services inflation (albeit, still above the magic 2% target).

Once again the Fed is in a bit of a sticky position. Inflation is not moving in the right direction. The real side of the economy is chugging right along, see this bullish report from the Financial Times. The calls for another rate cut at the meeting next week, in our view, are premature.

At Long last: September Employment Report

by paul gomme and peter rupert

The BLS is back! Employment rose 119,000 in September, neither high enough nor low enough to change anyone’s mind about the state of the economy, although it was more than twice as high as the Dow Jones consensus of 50,000. In August employment fell by 4,000 after a downward revision.

The private sector added 97,000 jobs and the government sector added back 22,000 jobs after shedding 22,000 jobs in August. The service sector added the bulk of jobs, growing 87,000.

The unemployment rate ticked up from 4.32% to 4.40% but still remains relatively low but has increased substantially for African Americans and spiked for those without a high school degree.

At the end of the day, the report will most likely not change anyone’s opinion about their view of the current stance of the economy or monetary policy.

September CPI Inflation

On Friday, the Bureau of Labor Statistics released Consumer Price Index data for September. While the annualized month-over-month CPI inflation rate fell (from 4.69% in August to 3.79% in September), the annual rate rose (2.94% to 3.02%) as did our measure of trend (from 3.18% to 3.38%).

Core CPI inflation provides a glimmer of good news: the monthly, annual and trend rates all fell. The annualized monthly inflation rate fell from 4.23% to 2.76; the anual rate from 3.11% to 3.03%, and our trend from 3.38% to 3.17%.

Policy Outlook

Rather than speculate as to what the FOMC is likely to do with its policy rate at its upcoming meeting, we’ll focus on what the committee should do. Keep in mind that the FOMC primarily looks at core PCE inflation, not (core) CPI inflation. However, the PCE data is not scheduled to be released until Friday while the committee meets Tuesday and Wednesday. (Given the federal government shutdown, we were taken by surprise when the BLS released the CPI numbers; we have no idea whether the BEA will similarly release the PCE data on Friday.) Keeping in mind that on average CPI inflation runs ½ percentage points higher than the corresponding PCE inflation rate, our trend measure of core CPI inflation for September suggests that trend PCE inflation can be expected to be around 2.7% – 0.7 percentage points higher than the FOMC’s target of 2%. Alternatively, if the change in trend core PCE inflation is the same as for trend core CPI inflation (0.2 percentage points), expect a PCE inflation rate just over 2.6% – again higher than target. Further lowering the Fed’s policy rate is not warranted given these inflation numbers. As many know, the Fed has a dual mandate and has indicated that the risks of a labor market slowdown has become a major factor in the decision making process. Unfortunately, the BLS has not released the latest employment numbers.