Tag: labor market

Labor market stuff

Posted on by peter.c.rupert

by paul gomme and peter rupert

Employment

The BLS announced that December employment increased by 50,000, following November’s 56,000 (revised down from 64,000). October employment fell 173,000 after a 68,000 downward revision.

Despite the weak employment gains from the Establishment Survey, the unemployment rate ticked down from 4.54% in November to 4.38% in December. This fall in the unemployment rate is chiefly due to the number of unemployed persons falling from 7.8 million (November) to 7.5 million (December). This decline was large enough that the labor force fell (by 46 thousand). On its own, a drop in the labor force tends to push up the unemployment rate.

job openings and labor turnover survey (JOLTS)

According to the JOLTS data, there was very little movement in vacancies, hires or layoffs. The rates shown below are calculated by the variable in question divided by total employment or total employment plus openings. For example, if employment is 9.5 million and there are 0.5 million openings then the openings rate is 0.5/(9.5+0.5) = .05 = 5%. It is also useful to see the relationship between the level of unemployment and the level of openings. The number of unemployed persons fell by 278,000 in December, leaving 7.5 million unemployed persons, close to the number of job openings, 7.1 million.

Productivity and costs

Nonfarm business sector labor productivity increased 4.9% in the third quarter of 2025. Output increased 5.4% while hours worked increased only slightly, 0.5%. This led to a decline in unit labor costs of 1.9% as hourly compensation increased by 2.9% while productivity increased 4.9%.

Discussion

Despite the somewhat anemic employment numbers, other aspects of the labor market are doing well. Unemployment has fallen a bit, productivity is the highest we have seen in a couple of years. Firms continue to have vacant slots and, as can be seen in the JOLTS graphs above, tend to fall quite quickly at the onset of a recession. No sign of that yet. So, if you are searching for a reason to lower rates, this probably isn’t the best place to look.

Inflation and jobs

Posted on by Paul Gomme

We are finally seeing jobs numbers for October and November. The Bureau of Labor Statistics press release studiously failed to mention the loss of 105 thousand jobs in October — except to mention the 162 thousand fall in federal government employment. Perhaps this omission is a leftover from Trump having fired the previous head of the BLS after the BLS revised the May and June employment numbers down. With September employment revised down to 108 thousand (from 119 thousand), there was a scant 3,000 increase in employment over September and October. November delivered an anemic 64 thousand job gain.

As noted in the BLS press release, due to the Federal government shut down, the household survey for October was not collected. In the figures using household survey data, we have allocated half of the change from September to November to each of October and November (and omit the October figure to emphasize that this data is unavailable).

The unemployment rate is similarly missing for October 2025. The November unemployment rate rose to 4.56%, up from 4.44% in September. This is the highest unemployment rate in four years.

Overall, the employment numbers are fairly weak. Although average weekly hours rose from 34.2 to 34.3, so that total hours of work in the US rose. Moreover, firms continue to be opening jobs at a relatively high rate even though the hiring rate has been falling.

Inflation

There were two price index reports released, the September PCE and the November CPI. The September monthly (annualized) PCE rose slightly, from 3.14% to 3.27%. Our preferred trend measure rose from 2.70% to 2.89%. The Fed’s inflation measure of choice, the core PCE (PCEX) fell from 2.68% to 2.40% and our trend measure also fell, from 2.82% to 2.68%. While core PCE inflation is moving in the right direction, it is still above the FOMC’s 2% target.

Due to the federal government shutdown, October data for the Consumer Price Index was not collected. Below, the November CPI inflation rate is the average for the two months from September to November. The monthly annualized CPI rate for October November averaged 1.23%, down from 3.79% in September and our trend measure fell to 2.19% (October-November) from 3.38% in September. In the graphs below we have included the November number with dots. Annualized core CPI inflation was 0.92% in October-November while the trend measure was 1.94%.

Certainly good news on the inflation front: the last reading on the Fed’s preferred core PCE inflation measure moved down (albeit still above target) and the more timely CPI measures have continued downward, a trend that hopefully will soon be reflected in the PCE inflation measures. As inflation approaches target, the inflation hawks on the FOMC will have less reason to insist on keeping interest rates high. At the same time, the slow hiring in the labor market should allow some to argue more strongly for more rate cuts.

PCE Inflation: Still Too High

Posted on by Paul Gomme

By Paul Gomme and Peter Rupert

About the only good thing that can be said about the incoming PCE inflation data: It could have been worse. At an annual rate, the month-over-month overall PCE inflation rate popped up to 3.22% in August from 1.97% in July; the corresponding core PCE inflation rate slipped from 2.86% to 2.76%. The annual (year-over-year) PCE inflation rate rose from 2.60% to 2.74%; core, from 2.85% to 2.91%. Finally, our measure of trend PCE inflation rose to 2.72% from 2.46%; trend core PCE inflation fell slightly to 2.84% from 2.88%.

And exactly what is so troubling in terms of the real side of the economy? Granted, there have recently been some very low employment numbers. Yet, a broader look at the labor market doesn’t add up to ringing the alarm bell and lower rates. In terms of job openings, outside of the pandemic, the rate of job openings is pretty much the highest it has ever been. There has been no obvious change in the rate of layoffs. The unemployment rate remains quite low by historical standards. Real gross domestic product was recently revised up, from 3.3% to 3.8%. Using monthly data on non-farm payroll
employment, industrial production, real personal income excluding transfer payments,
and real manufacturing and trade sales, the probability of being in a recession (here is the Piger website) is 1.0%.

Policy Outlook

In the FOMC’s recent announcement reducing its policy rate by 25 basis points, the committee expressed its opinion that the balance of risks has shifted towards unemployment…and away from inflation. We stand by our earlier opinion that job number 1 for the Fed is low and stable inflation; good real-side outcomes will ultimately result from executing on the inflation front. The risk to the policy outlook is that 3% inflation is the new de facto target, up from the stated 2% target. Already, short-term inflation expectations have risen. Experience from the 1970s and 1980s tells us that it is economically painful to reduce expected inflation. Responsible policy would see the Fed bringing inflation back down to its 2% target, with fiscal policy addressing the jobs situation.

June Employment Report

Posted on by Paul Gomme

According to the BLS Employment Survey, the U.S. economy added another 147 thousand jobs in June — a very respectable number. Although the private sector saw a weak employment increase of 74 thousand.

The BLS noted gains in the government sector (gaining 73 thousand jobs, despite a reduction of 7 thousand at the Federal level) and health care (up 39 thousand jobs).

Average hours of work fell to 34.2 from 34.3 and has been oscillating between the two for several months.

From the Household Survey in the same BLS release, the unemployment rate dipped from 4.24% in May to 4.12% in June.

One dark spot in the employment outlook is that continuing unemployment insurance claims have risen in June. This increase may reflect increased difficulty of the unemployed to find suitable jobs.

JOLTS (Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey) allows for a deeper dive into the data; this data was released on July 1 and includes data for May but not June. It continues to be the case that there are more available jobs than folks classified as “unemployed” (actively seeking a job). Of course, aggregate measures like these say nothing about the match between skills needed for open jobs, and the skills of the unemployed.

As the job openings rate has fallen since 2022, so has the hiring rate and the quit rate. Since JOLTS is a relatively new survey, it covers a span of time with very few complete business cycles. Consequently, it’s difficult to say what typcally happends to the JOLTS rates at the oneset of a recession. That said, around a recession as the labor market tightens we would expect to see a fall in the quit, openings and hiring rates, and a rise in the layoff rate. Thus far in 2025, it is hard to see any such changes.

While there were some spots of concern, the labor market shows little signs of weakening. Indeed the strength of the June report gives amunition to those on the FOMC advocating for no action at its July meeting.

Solid February Employment Report

Posted on by Paul Gomme

The Bureau of Labor Statistics Establishment Survey recorded an increase in employment of 151 thousand for February. This increase is only slightly below the average for the previous 12 months. Another way to think about the February number: it exceeds 6 of the previous 12 month employment gains.

While government employment rose by 11 thousand jobs in February, federal government employment dropped by 10 thousand.

The household survey from the BLS press release indicated a decline in the labor force participation rate (62.6% to 62.4%) and an employment-to-population ratio decline (60.1% to 59.9%). The report showed a slight increase in the unemployment rate, from 4.01% in January to 4.14% in February. For the most part, the unemployment rate has hovered around 4.1% for the last 8 months.

Although the unemployment rate has been trending up over the past year or so, keep in mind that it is, historically, quite low.

January Employment: meh

Posted on by peter.c.rupert

by paul gomme and peter rupert

The BLS announced that the establishment survey revealed a 143,000 increase in employment in January, 111,000 of that came from private payrolls. Moreover, all of the private employment increase came from the service sector as the goods producing sector had a net of zero. November was revised up by 49,000 and December by 51,000.

Average hours worked in January fell to 34.1 hours. Apart from the pandemic, the last time it was 34.1 was back in April of 2010. With the 111,000 increase in private employment and the reduction in average hours of work, total hours worked also fell.

Average hourly earnings for private workers rose 0.5% over the month (5.9% on an annual basis). Using various inflation measures, real hourly earnings have been steadily rising over the past couple of years.

The household survey indicated that the labor force participation rate increased from 62.5% to 62.6% and the employment to population ratio increased from 60.0% to 60.1%. The unemployment rate fell from 4.08% to 4.01%.

An article in the New York Times suggested that the jobs report would be “confusing” due to massive revisions owing to an annual process that reconciles the differences between the establishment and household surveys. Our reading: not so much. There was no revision to the household survey employment numbers. While establishment survey employment was revised down some 610,000 as of December 2024, the level of employment was around 159 million. While 610,000 would be a massive change on a monthly basis, that’s not the right way to think about the revision since the revisions are spread over many months. A better way to think about the revision: the level of employment in December was revised down roughly 0.4%. The figure below shows substantial downward revisions in January and March 2024, and similarly large upward revisions for November and December.

On Tuesday, the BLS released the job openings and labor turnover summary (JOLTS). The job openings rate fell somewhat but hires and separations changed little.

On Thursday, the BLS released data on productivity and costs. Growth in productivity fell from 2.3% in 2024Q3 to 1.2% in 2024Q4. Most of this decline can be attributed to a fall in output growth (from 3.6% to 2.3%). Growth in hours worked also fell, from 1.3% to 1.0%.

The labor market, as always, has some ups and downs in the underlying components. Job growth was so-so and both the labor force participation rate and employment to population ratio rose. Average hourly earnings show strong growth. However, average hours of work and total hours fell as did productivity. These reports do not really alter the “wait and see” approach outlined by the FOMC after their recent meeting.

Job Market Remains Strong

Posted on by Paul Gomme

As reported by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), according to the Establishment Survey, nonfarm payroll employment rose by 256 thousand jobs in December — well in excess of expectations of 165 thousand new jobs reported by Bloomberg. The BLS noted that December’s job gains exceeded the average monthly gain for 2024 of 186 thousand.

Sectors receiving particular attention by the BLS were: health care added 46 thousand jobs in December (lower than the average of 57 thousand jobs per month in 2024), government gained 33 thousand jobs (down from the 2024 average of 37 thousand), social assistance was up 23 thousand (compared to an average of18 thousand per month in 2024), and retail trade accrued 43 thousand additional jobs in December after losing 29 thousand jobs in November (for the year, retail trade was essentially unchanged).

The household survey showed an increase in employment of 478,000 and a decrease in unemployed persons of 235,000. The employment to population ratio increased to 60% and the participation remained at 62.5%. The unemployment rate fell from 4.23% to 4.09%.

Although the overall labor force participation rate is still much lower than its peak in the late 1990’s, the rate for prime-age workers is close to it’s all-time high.

With a decline in the number of unemployed persons and a recent increase in job openings, we continue to see more openings than persons searching for jobs, meaning jobs are, in some sense, plentiful.

These stronger than expected labor market gains cast more doubt on the potential for future declines in the Fed Funds rate, as indicated in their December 18 announcement:

In considering the extent and timing of additional adjustments to the target range for the federal funds rate, the Committee will carefully assess incoming data, the evolving outlook, and the balance of risks.

Indeed, if the next inflation report shows no real progress in moving toward the 2% target, it is quite likely, in our view, that the Fed should take a pause while they wait for more incoming signals.

Hot September Employment

Posted on by peter.c.rupert

By Paul gomme and Peter Rupert

The BLS announced that payroll employment increased 254,000 in September (plus 72,000 in upward revisions over the previous two months), solidly beating the “forecasts” that hovered around 150,000. Before the report many had talked about the slowing of the labor market, such as this from CNBC:

September’s jobs picture is expected to look a lot like August’s — a gradual slowdown in hiring from earlier this year, a modest increase in wages and a labor market that is looking a lot like many policymakers had hoped it would.

Well, looks like policy makers didn’t get what they hoped for! In fact it looks more like a gradual increase in hiring over the past four months. The private sector led the charge, increasing 223,000, the second highest reading since May of 2023.

Private sector service jobs increased 202,000 with health services and social assistance rising 71,700 and leisure and hospitality jumping up 78,000, the highest since January, 2023. Declines were seen in manufacturing of both durable goods, down 3,000 and non-durable goods down 4,000.

Average hours of work fell from 34.3 to 34.2, so that total hours of work fell 1.5%. Average hourly earnings climbed to $35.36 from $35.23. The growth in hourly earnings continues to outpace CPI inflation, meaning real wages are rising.

The household survey shows an employment increase of 430,000 and the number of unemployed persons fell 281,000. The labor force increased 150,000. The unemployment rate declined from 4.22% to 4.05%. Curiously, in its press release, the Bureau of Labor Statistics said that the unemployment rate was little changed between August and September.

Earlier this week, the Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) was released and showed little change in job openings, hires and separations. There are still more job openings than the number of unemployed persons.

Overall, the labor market continues to defy the press who seem to be constantly trying to show the economy is softening. No signs here. What will this do to the outlook for the Fed’s next steps? The labor market is also at odds with the Fed, at least in terms of their last statement,

Recent indicators suggest that economic activity has continued to expand at a solid pace. Job gains have slowed, and the unemployment rate has moved up but remains low. Inflation has made further progress toward the Committee’s 2 percent objective but remains somewhat elevated.

Looking at the very first graph on this post, one can see that job gains have been increasing over the past several months and the unemployment rate actually fell this month. With the strong GDP numbers and this strong labor market outcome it may shift the thinking that inflation pressures could/might/will be increasing. Was the recent 50bp cut too much too soon?

August Employment Report

Posted on by Paul Gomme

On September 6, the Bureau of Labor Statistics released its employment report for August. According to the Establishment Survey, the US economy added 142 thousand jobs in August. In addition, the previous two months were revised down, -61 in June and -25 in July. The Household Survey put the gain at 168 thousand jobs.

From the Establishment Survey, the leisure and hospitality sector added 46 thousand jobs; construction 34 thousand jobs; and health care 30 thousand jobs. Sectors losing jobs were led by manufacturing (24 thousand) and retail trade (11 thousand).

Average weekly hours rose from 34.2 to 34.3 so that total hours of work increased by 4.7%. Average hourly earnings increased 0.4%, from $35.07 to $35.21.

The unemployment rate, derived from the Household Survey, fell marginally, from 4.25% to 4.22%. (The headline numbers are touting a decline from 4.3% to 4.2%.) However, a broader measure of the unemployment rate which includes marginally attached individuals rose between July and August, from 7.8% to 7.9%.

Policy Implications

Is strength or weakness in the eye of the beholder? Or rather, in the data of the beholder?

Given the signaling from members of the FOMC, it’s pretty clear that the committee will lower the Federal funds rate at its next meeting later in September. Speculation is growing that the committee may deliver a 50 basis point reduction rather that `just’ a 25 point reduction. The case for a more aggressive loosening of monetary policy lies on the real side of the economy. Where does this weak real side show up? Maybe in the employment numbers reported above. Yet, the same report shows a slight decline in the unemployment rate and a 48 thousand decline in the number unemployed. The labor force increased by 120 thousand. As mentioned above, wage growth was fairly strong and total hours increased substantially. Second quarter real GDP growth was revised up from 2.8% to 3.0%. Considering that US population growth is running around 0.5% per year, real per capita output growth for the second quarter is around 2.5% which is well above its long run average. Meanwhile, while PCE inflation has fallen, it is still a bit above the FOMC’s 2% target.

June employment

Posted on by peter.c.rupert

By Paul Gomme and Peter Rupert

The BLS announced that employment in June rose 206,000, about 1/3 of that came from government employment. Downward revisions to the earlier months totaled 111,000.

The service sector saw a 117,000 increase with the health care and social assistance sector increasing 82,400; however the largest decline in the service sector came from temporary help services, falling 48,900 and has been in decline for a over the past year and a half or so.

Average hours of work remained steady at 34.3 and with the 136,000 private sector increase in employment meant only a small increase in total hours of work.

The household survey shows a 116,000 increase in employment. 277,000 more people entered the labor force and the number of unemployed persons increased 162,000. These changes led to an increase in the unemployment rate from 3.96% to 4.05%.

Policy Chatter

The labor market continues to run strong, despite the recent mediocre showing although the unemployment has risen slightly to 4.05%. Inflation has trended down and, depending on the particular measure, is not a great cause for concern. Some are calling for an interest rate cut my the Fed. Indeed, Mark Zandi, Chief Economist at Moody’s, has said that the Fed should lower interest rates since the Fed “has hit their objective.” If they have hit their objective of full employment and low inflation, does it seem reasonable to be lowering, or raising rates, at this time. He does continue by saying that maybe the equilibrium interest rate for the economy could be higher, but he says it is not 5.5%. Obviously this is an issue that the Fed will be dealing with in the near future.